World in Context

A public newsroom

World events, explained for Nepal and South Asia

Most people in our region learn about the world from social media. Headlines arrive without history, proof, or a sense of why they matter. World in Context is a public newsroom that explains what happened, why it matters, and — when it is true — what it means here.

Continue reading

The gap

Rumour travels. Context does not.

International wires write first for readers in Washington, London, and Delhi. A trade deal, a war, or a central-bank decision reaches Nepal and South Asia as a fragment: a clip, a screenshot, a claim with no source.

When people cannot see the evidence, they fill the gap with whatever the feed rewards. That is how unverified posts become “the news,” and how world affairs start to feel remote or invented.

What we publish

A newsroom, not a feed.

  • News for what happened. Analysis for what it means. Explainers for how a thing works.

  • A Nepal-relevance note only when the story actually touches the region — never as decoration.

  • Named sources, labelled by how we used them. Public corrections when we get something wrong.

The difference

Social media is not a newsroom.

On social media

  • A clip with no named source

  • Speed rewarded over evidence

  • World news with no local frame

  • Errors disappear into the feed

On World in Context

  • Sources with a role: primary, data, quote

  • Context before virality

  • Nepal relevance only when it is real

  • Corrections stay on the story

How we work

Nothing is public until it has been checked.

Every story moves through the newsroom before it reaches readers. The public site only publishes what the desk has already approved.

01

Research

Gather primary documents, official data, and reporting. Decide whether the story is news, analysis, or an explainer.

02

Write

Lead with what happened. Then explain why it matters. Keep opinion labelled. Do not smuggle argument into a news report.

03

Fact-check

Every claim needs a source. Sources are stored with a role — primary, corroboration, data, quote — not as a generic link dump.

04

Review and publish

Editorial review comes last. After publication, an error is marked Corrected or Updated and kept on the page.

What the site does

Built for reading, not for the algorithm.

Explainers and analysis

Stories are typed as news, analysis, explainer, or opinion so readers know which contract they are getting.

Nepal relevance

Editors mark relevance as none, low, medium, or high, and can add a note. If a story does not touch the region, we do not invent a local angle.

Named sources

Citations sit at the end of the story, with the organisation, a link when one exists, and the job that source did.

Public corrections

A corrected or updated badge appears on the story. The change is described in plain language, with a date.

Sections that mean something

World, geopolitics, the global economy, Nepal, technology, analysis, and explainers — not a tag cloud of trending words.

Free to read

No paywall and no engagement bait. Bylines are named. Sponsored work, when it exists, is labelled.

Story types

The label is part of the journalism.

News

What happened, as it can be established.

Analysis

What the facts mean, and what they do not.

Explainer

How a system, conflict, or decision works.

Opinion

An argument, labelled as such.


The project

A truthful information portal, not another feed.

World in Context exists so readers in Nepal and South Asia can follow world affairs with evidence, history, and a local frame — instead of treating viral posts as the record.

Continue reading